Unbelievably, in the 20-some odd, off and on years
I’ve lived in Chicago, I’d never been to the Printer’s Row Book Fair, now known
as Printer’s Row Lit Fest.
This year, I decided to change that.
A few weeks back, I perused the scheduled events with
no particular agenda, but waited to see what would catch my eye. And what
did follows:
The event was held in the cavernous Pritzker
Auditorium at the Chicago Public Library and surprisingly, it wasn’t packed to
the rafters. All told, there were maybe about 100 people, give or take,
who attended the event. As I expected, BTB was lovely and entertaining.
She shared her writing schedule (up every day at 4:30 a.m. to edit the previous
day’s work, with a stop at 7:00 to make two hardboiled eggs for her husband,
then back to the typewriter until 4:00 p.m.) reveals she hoards her particular
brand of typewriter, just in case they stop being made (typing on a computer
give her writer’s block) and what she believes is the heart of fiction writing
(CHARACTER DRIVES PLOT,
not the other way around).
“A Woman of Substance” was BTB’s first novel and from
what I could gather, the one she’s most well-known for. A journalist by
trade who always wanted to write fiction, BTB revealed that when she was trying
to figure out what to write, she sat down with a yellow legal pad and asked
herself a series of questions, the first of which was what kind of book she
wanted to write. She came up with a “traditional old-fashioned saga,” and
after answering the litany of questions she’d peppered herself with, at the
bottom of that page she wrote, “A Woman of Substance.”
And thus, a second career was
born.
BTB’s advice to aspiring
writers is “Don’t try and write a bestseller,” because inevitably you’ll fail.
She dismisses critics who say her books rely too much on coincidences “because
life is full of them.” True. True.
I didn’t buy any of her
books today, but I do plan to check out “A Woman of Substance.” As soon
as I read the 37 books stacked next to my bed waiting like impatient children
to be read.
I was allowed in.
Gillian Flynn’s third
novel, “Gone Girl” has been getting crazy good buzz, including glowing reviews
on Amazon (no sarcasm here, but it’s usually a pretty good barometer for
weeding out the crap from the roses) and a love letter from the New York Times." There was a butt in every seat (about 75) and we were all rapt. Held at Grace Place, an Episcopal Church,, Gillian read a few paragraphs from “Gone Girl,” and as is usually the case with
those of us attracted to the dark and ugly side of life, she was a funny,
sunny, intelligent young woman.
She classifies herself as a
“highly inefficient writer,” who goes through draft after draft after draft and
can be thirty pages out from the end and still have no idea “whodunit.”
What a relief from all the strict writing advice that mandates a ninety page
outline before drafting a novel. Gillian with a hard “G” had won my heart.
I was bold enough to
venture a question about what authors or books inspired her in her own writing
and she came back with Stephen King, Tana French, Margaret Atwood and Joyce
Carol Oates (note to self, load up my Kindle with the aforementioned).
Someone else asked if she bristled at being pegged as a “mystery writer,” and
she said while her books are light on procedure, unlike a lot of popular
mysteries, she doesn’t mind at all being classified as such. She was
quick to point out that anyone who snubs their noses at “genre” books are
really missing out on some terrific books, pointing to Laura Lippman and Kate
Atkinson as two authors shaking up the genre (Atkinson’s Case Histories just knocked me out. Fantastic book.)
When an author garners the
kind of kudos Gillian Flynn with a hard “G” is getting, you know Hollywood will
come calling. It looks as though the movie rights for “Gone Girl” are an
inevitable conclusion and Amy Adams is attached to an adaptation of “Dark
Places,” which will be helmed by French director, Gilles Paquet-Brenner.
Gillian relayed a story about how she took the director on a tour of the Kansas
heartland where “Dark Places” is set. They finished the day at a local
restaurant and ordered grilled cheese, something he’d never heard of (“It’s
like a Croque-Monsieur,” Gillian told him as he sniffed around the suspicious
slab of Velveeta smashed between two buttery, golden brown wedges of Wonder
Bread. As she devoured her sandwich, he leaned over to inform her “You
know this isn’t real food, right?”) To which I say, “Yes…yes it is.”
I almost never buy
hardcover books, but I plunked down $27 and some change for a chance to have
Gillian sign “Gone Girl” for me. I have decided to move it to the
position of “favorite child” and read it sooner rather than later. And
then wait for the movie.
Raymond
Benson and Friends
I made a last minute
decision to attend a panel of thriller writers moderated by Raymond Benson (he wrote the James Bond Novels
from 1996-2002) about female protagonists in thrillers. The stars of the panel
were Julie Kramer,
Jaime Freveletti, Libby Hellmann and David Ellis. I’ve never read any of these authors, but have heard of a few of
them, and I was interested to learn their take on female protagonists in the
modern American thriller.
The small room was packed
and the audience was quite engaged with the panel and the panel was quite
engaged with each other. I’d heard of Raymond Benson and Jaime
Freveletti, but was unfamiliar with the others. In addition to his standalone and series legal thrillers, David Ellis
co-wrote a book
you’ve probably heard of by an author you’ve probably heard of, Libby Hellmann writes thrillers that
jump around in time and are both series and standalone, Julie Kramer as a
former news producer, sets all her books in the frenzied world of media
(apparently, they’re termed as “media thrillers,” a new term for me) and Jaime
Freveletti writes high-concept thrillers about biological warfare and has been
commissioned by Robert Ludlum’s estate to ghostwrite under his name.
The topics varied from
whether or not it’s okay for a female protagonist to cuss (by and large, no was
the consensus, which I found strange) to whether or not they could have sex
(yes, but not as much as James Bond did, lest they be sluts who swear like
sailors. I dunno. I’d probably buy that book.) Who to kill (never
children) being a woman writing believable male characters (note: male cops
will not take note of the curtains in a room) and being a man writing
believable female characters (is it a shirt or a blouse?) were all of great
interest to both the readers and the panelists.
I didn’t buy any of their
books, having spent my book budget for the day on the hardcover of “Gone Girl,”
but I was entertained and intrigued enough to explore these authors further in
the future.
I did a courtesy lap around
the main area of the actual Lit Fest, but truth be told, I wasn’t in the right
frame of mind to paw through the wares of the dedicated booksellers lining
Dearborn Street. Overall though, I would give my first Printer’s
Row Lit Fest a resounding A +. I got a little of what I came for
and then some. I will be back in 2013.
Now, please excuse me while
I go read some books.
Comments
Post a Comment