Characters You Love To Hate, Law and Order, Badass Women and Love-ish Triangles: Printer’s Row Lit Fest 2015
This past
weekend, for the fourth year in a row, I attended Printer’s Row Lit Fest, the
largest outdoor literary festival in the Midwest and my official start to
summer.
It’s interesting
to think about not only my first Lit Fest back in 2012 (read about it here)
but also how it parallels with the journey of my indie writing career. Back
then, I was unpublished and reading everything I could get my hands on about indie
publishing. I was also about to head to Toronto for a weeklong writing class
with my “author crush,” Joy Fielding (read about that here).
Four Lit Fests later, I’ve released three books, am about to release two more
and still doing what I can every day to learn as much as I can about this
business.
So, in the
interest of hanging out with my tribe, finding new books to read and furthering
my education on the business and the craft, I once again headed to Printer’s
Row and Lit Fest. And here’s what I did:
Panel Discussion: The
Characters You Love to Hate Featuring Mystery Writers, J. Michael Major, Kristi Belcamino, Lynne
Ramondo and Shane Gericke. Moderated by Lori Rader-Day
It was a packed house Saturday
morning as attendees crowded into what might have been a science classroom at
Jones College Prep. I attend at least one Mystery Writers of America panel each
year (that whole tribe thing) and always enjoy the nuggets I pick up. The
discussion centered around why unlikable characters really are likable, i.e.
Hannibal Lecter and Walter White. Bad guys provide more opportunity for conflict,
because goody two-shoes characters are “boring” (true) and as J. Michael Major
put it, “our real world is filled with so much mundaneness,” why would you want
to write about it, much less read about it (also true)?
I just had to stop here and say Shane Gericke had my line
of the day: “We all have evil inside is . . . we all have mean streaks.”
Each author shared
some of their favorite anti-heroes including House, Lincoln Rhyme from Jefferey
Deaver’s series, Tom Ripley, Raymond “Red” Reddington (James Spader, “The
Blacklist”), Carrie Mathison (Claire Danes, “Homeland”) and Ken Brunen’s
creation, Jack Taylor.
In today’s climate,
unlikable characters can’t be “cartoon characters,” and unlike in the “Mickey
Spillane era, you have to explain it.” In other words, you can’t
just have evil for evil sakes. There has to be a motivation for why – which is
what makes character development even more essential. Lynne Ramondo commented “The Postman Always
Rings Twice,” while shocking in its day, it wouldn’t make much of a ripple
today (true again.)
Big takeaway: “To
understand any character (bad guys included) you have to understand their
background.”
It was fun to hear the
perspective of each author on this intriguing topic and Lori Rader-Day was a
charming moderator.
Mystery Writers of America Impromptu Sessions
The Midwest Chapter of the Mystery Writers of America
hosted a number of mini-sessions in their tent. I stopped by for one and wound
up staying for three. There was an impromptu session by Susanna Calkins and
another author whose name I didn’t catch, on social media and marketing. The
session that followed featured Patricia Skalka (who writes mysteries set in
Door County, Wisconsin) and another author whose name I also missed (I’m really
batting a thousand here – he was from Detroit and during the discussion,
invoked some of that city’s greats including Elmore Leonard and Loren D.
Estleman) on their writing process, where they get their ideas and the
role setting plays in their work.
The third session (the
one I came for) was “Law and Order,” meant to feature a police detective
(aspiring mystery writer, Adam Henkels, a Chicago-area police officer) and a
lawyer. The lawyer couldn’t join the fun, but Matthew Clemens, who has penned TV tie-in
novels for CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, CSI: Miami, Dark
Angel, Bones, and Criminal Minds, stepped in to
pinch hit. It was a great riff about “story showing,” not “storytelling,” the
importance of editing, why writing about police work is so boring(!) and why it’s
so different from what we see on TV (budgets, for starters). That was probably
my favorite mini-session. Unfortunately, the session started late, which meant
I had to bolt to get to my next event. Still, I had a blast.
Panel Discussion: Breaking the Deadly Glass
Ceiling: Libby Fischer Hellmann, Jessie Chandler, Susanna Calkins, Raymond
Benson moderated by Jeffrey Marks
My last session of the day was
about kick-ass female characters. Libby Fischer Hellmann, who pens two popular
thriller series with female protagonists, wondered why women have to have this
characterization (fair point). The discussion centered around the depiction of
strong women characters in fiction and even in non-fiction and how women can
“go the wall” when it comes to facing challenges and conflict. Raymond Benson,
who wrote several James Bond books, admitted he, “burned out all of his
testosterone,” on that series, which lead him to create a female superhero,
“The Black Stiletto.” Jessie Chandler, whose mysteries feature a lesbian
protagonist, is a former Borders manager and she populated her books with her
former cohorts (being a former Barnes & Noble bookseller, I can appreciate
that – also, Jessie mentioned she got her start with NaNoWriMo.)
One of my personal favorite bad-ass women (picture courtesy of TNT)
A few interesting tidbits that came out of the session:
-
Women make 80 percent of the
book buying choices
-
Non-fiction is easier to sell
and get reviewed
-
Women read more male authors
than female authors
-
Susanna Calkins had a male author tell her point-blank, “I
don’t read books about women.” (Alrighty then.)
Favorite authors of the panelists include Agatha Christie, Ruth Rendell
and Val McDermid.
Fiction: Love Triangles:
Mary Kubica (“The Good Girl”) and Rebecca Dinerstein (“The Sunlit Night.”)
Admittedly, I wasn’t
quite sure what to expect with this event, as based on what I’d read about each
book, love triangles didn’t seem to figure all that prominently into either
story. However, I was really excited to see/hear Mary Kubica, as “The Good
Girl,” has been on my radar as a “to be read,” for quite a while. I was
pleasantly surprised to learn she was a Chicago girl, so even more reason to brave
the rain on Sunday.
Turns out, love
triangles really don’t play a part in either novel and the moderator cheerfully
informed us they’d be “going rogue” for the presentation (love it.). Each
author did a short reading: Mary Kubica from her forthcoming book, “Pretty Baby,”
(her descriptions of Chicago give me something to aspire to), while Rebecca
Dinerstein read from her book, which traverses Brooklyn and Norway. Rebecca
Dinerstein indentifies herself as a poet and it definitely shows in her work –
gorgeous writing.
(MaryKubica.com)
Since we were “going
rogue,” the conversation centered around the importance of place and setting
(see a theme here?) in their work and with genre being so critical in today’s
digital age, how they would classify their work (Kubica – psychological suspense,
Dinerstein – women’s fiction, though she admitted she’d take, “any genre anyone
wants to give me.”). Each confessed that genre can be tricky for women authors,
but stressed that each of their works touch on the emotional things women go
through – work, family, relationships, love, so women’s fiction would be apt
for both.
I ventured a
question, asking each who some of their favorite authors are: Kubica – S.J.
Watson (ironically, I’m currently reading “Before I Go To Sleep.” She gave it a
huge thumbs up.) Heather Gudenkauf, Gillian Flynn, another Chicago girl.
Interestingly enough, “The Good Girl” has drawn numerous comparisons to “Gone
Girl.” In doing a little research for this post, I
found an interview where she also chose Liane Moriarty Ann Hood and Anita
Shreve as favorites (could
MK be my spirit animal??). Dinerstein praised Michael Chabon and considers herself a
Bronte girl, “Jane Eyre” in particular being a favorite.
I purchased, “The Good
Girl,” and had it signed. I have also moved it to the top of my “to be read”
pile.
I usually leave Lit
Fest feeling awed and inspired and this year was no exception. I came home and
worked up three blurbs for my WIP, tinkered with said WIP (now in the in hands
of my First Reader) and wrote a page and a half of an idea for a new book that’s
been tickling my brain for a few weeks. So many great events and authors and
information and books. So many books. It’s better than a candy store.
Already dreaming
of Lit Fest 2016.
Comments
Post a Comment